Outlines of Julie E. Cohen (2007) 40 U.C. Davis Law Rev.
I. The Creativity Paradox, p. 1151
Creativity is universally agreed to be a good that copyright law should seek to promote, yet copyright scholarship and policymaking have proceeded largely on the basis of assumptions about what it actually is. When asked to discuss the source of their inspiration, individual artists describe a process that is intrinsically ineffable. (Cohen, 2007, p. 1151)
[ineffable: inexpressible; unutterable. 但類似鄭X這個他母親養的人渣「想要做大事」,說明creativity 有深入澄清的必要。]
Rights theorists of all varieties have generally subscribed to this understanding, describing creativity in terms of an individual liberty whose form remains largely unspecified. Economic theorists of copyright work from the opposite end of the creative process, seeking to divine the optimal rules for promoting creativity be measuring its marketable byproducts.
(Cohen, 2007, p. 1152)
[ineffable: inexpressible; unutterable. 但類似鄭X這個他母親養的人渣「想要做大事」,說明creativity 有深入澄清的必要。]
Rights theorists of all varieties have generally subscribed to this understanding, describing creativity in terms of an individual liberty whose form remains largely unspecified. Economic theorists of copyright work from the opposite end of the creative process, seeking to divine the optimal rules for promoting creativity be measuring its marketable byproducts.
(Cohen, 2007, p. 1152)
沒有留言:
張貼留言